
この自動翻訳機能はPC上のChromeまたはIEで機能します。Safariまたはスマホでは機能しない可能性があります。
This automatic translation feature works on PC browsers such as Chrome or Internet Explorer. It may not work on Safari or on smartphones or tablet devices.
Latest Topic 2025/12/20
Renewed comments about “Caution for misunderstanding about Gravity Reactor “

It’s an undeniable fact that gravity has been the power source that has sustained the “workings of nature on earth” for millions of years. “The Gravity Reactor” is a new engine system that generates heavy torque energy from converting this gravitational weighting effects into rotational power on the endless track with powerful wave movement through singular fluid structural design. In principle, they’re an extremely simple, innovative technology that anyone, even those unfamiliar with science, can easily see, touch, and verify.
This singular technology has been to be unfairly criticized that it must be just a science fiction technology because it cannot be logically explained by current science and technology. But there never be any science technology theory that it can deny “the real” that it is reproduced anytime in the fact even if the reproduced phenomenon seams too incredible.
If any “quite normal scientists” who can honestly tell “the truth that physically reproduced in clear” as normal still exist, there would be no way to keep escaping from reality even though it is an inconvenient truth. Because there is no any scientific logics to deny actual fact that can be reproduced anytime. And this New Technology proofs that it theoretically enables to bring tremendously merits not only for all people but also all livings on earth obviously. And ordinary people who are watching parade of the “Naked Emperor” waring shameful virtual clothes, should also ask the truth without care of conformity pressure as well as for respective own responsibilities & profits.
For better or worse, this Gravity Reactor’s incredibly superior functionality in the simple structure is a far a way from the complex, high-tech culmination depicted in science fiction, leading to a feeling that no one can believe it, and no one wants to believe it. This thought has led to bring many of slanders and defamations in public. And something even worse, many one-sided, unreasonable demands come to us without any responsibilities such as, “I’ll give you chance to test it when it’s commercialized!” or “give you millions of purchase order as much as you want!”. Such words without malice are very unfair.
While logical negativity or criticism are very welcome, negativity based on generalized preconceived notions do not only harm social interests but also could destroy next generations future, so please be careful.
Science and technology experts clearly understand that this new technology based on simple principles will bring great benefits to human society, but they are extremely inconvenient truth because it will clearly overturn the complex scientific and technological theories they have built up, and they stubbornly refuse to confirm or verify the existence of this technology. In other words, even if anyone request the verification and evaluation of this technology to experts in the energy industry, never be able to get any legitimate answers or response.
If this technology were to be commercialized and widely adopted, it would mean that safe, clean energy would be easily available to anyone, anywhere, at any time. This would lead to dramatic development of the social economy, a major improvement in the global environment, and a significant expansion of comfortable living space even as the population increases, eliminating conflict and making a major contribution to peace and social development. As long as there is no scientific logic that can refute the operating logic of this technology, it is safe to say that investing in commercializing this technology, never be any risk. Although only people who are scared of this technology are experts and vested interests in thermal energy but they are already also aware of limitation of fuel resources and obliged to find other energy resource in less expensive anyway.

By holding as much water as possible in a slowly rotating turbine rotor, the weight of the water(gravity) is converted into stable torque energy(power of spin) at maximum efficiency.
System structure is very simple and compact in comparison with output, enabled to make with inexpensive commoditized materials.
Generating limitless stable power semi-permanently.
No emissions of Heat or CO2 ay all.
No any Risks for serious incident what ever happen.
Implementable anywhere gravity there.
If the size of system is in “1 cubic meter”, The Turbine Core Diameter should be about 70cm, 80cm the length.
Power Supply Capability in that size is to be over 20kWh(per Hour), 480kWh(per Day), 14,400kWh(per Month), 5MWh(per Year), It can cover the electricity consumption of approximately 40 average households.
The wattage units (such as 100W and 1000W) displayed on home appliances represent the amount of power consumed per hour. While “W/h” is the correct unit value for mathematical calculations, for some reason, indication of the “W/h” unit is avoided. Furthermore, the unit of “Wh” is used to be indicated as total accumulated energy consumption value for one hour. And this is why generally expressed as “W = Wh.” However, this is not a mathematically or physically correct unit at accurate calculation.
In physics, 1W = 1V x 1A, or 1 watt = 1 volt x 1 ampere, and it defines the instantaneous value per second. So, 1W*1second = 1Ws = 1W = 1J = 1J/s. Therefore, if keep consuming 1W for one hour (3600seconds), the actual accumulated energy consumption value is 3600W, so it should have been 1 Wh = 3600W actually but it shall be forced to indicate 3600J as the thermal energy. The “W” in home appliance notation is an abbreviation for “W/h” practically, and if the value of “h” is 1, dividing by 1 does not change the number, so just indication of “W=Wh” is used as normal in public.
Originally, the current unit of measurement, “Wh,” used to indicate accumulated volume of energy consumption or output over one hour should mathematically be “W/h,” but because “Wh” is already defined as a universal unit representing an independent block of energy per hour, this can often lead to major misunderstandings.
Incidentally, the amount of power generated by “solar panels” is indicate “instantaneous output per second” called also “W” as same though, but this “W” indicates a value unit per second and it is relatively accurate on physics and mathematics. Therefore, it is recognizable that the instantaneous power generation efficiency is extremely high. But it cannot measure easily as “Wh” at same level because the its lack of stability in power generation poses an issue, the electricity output value is totally different from the concept of “Wh” as defined as the accumulated value of Watt Energy Value per hour. And it is not easy to utilizing them, and when it comes to mega solar power plants, the difficulty of management to supply and distribution such the big amounts of instantaneous generated power of electricity to equally to many consumers rationally because electricity cannot be stored easily some where.
If an object with a mass of 1 kg is located 1 m above the ground, its potential energy is defined to be 9.8 J (9.8 joules).
J, or joule, is a unit of energy, and the amount of work done when a force of 1 N (1 newton) moves an object a distance of 1 m is 1 (J), and if that work takes 1 second, it is defined as 1 (W).
Therefore, if an object with a mass of 1 kg is located 1 m above the ground, the “impact energy” at the moment it hits the ground, dissipating its potential energy, is 9.8 (J) as thermal energy, which can be calculated as result of 9.8 (W) energy conversion of its impact energy per second. The matter is If that work continues for 3,600 second per 1 hour, or the impact energy is generated by 3,600 times, both situation means same amount of accumulated Watt energy ie “Wh”.
Energy calculations based on physics theory tend to be complicated by incorporating Joule thermodynamics like this. However, the process for calculating the amount of energy in watts does not actually need to take Joule heat into account; in electrical terms it is W = VA, or the instantaneous value of “voltage” x “current”, and in kinetic energy it can be simply calculated as W = Fs, or “force” x “distance”. An accurate “Wh” can also be calculated by simply adding up the “amount of energy exchanged” at that moment, such as whether it took 3600 seconds or 3600 times.
The amount of energy exchanged in watts value due to power of torque, or rotating moment vector, is the accumulated energy obtained by “continuously” multiplying the “leveraged force” at right angle applied to the radius of the rotational motion, that substantial power is actually much greater than just an image from figures of value at the moment. For example, if a 1 kg weight is attached to the end of a 1 meter rod, the force that keeps the rod parallel to the ground by the reaction force tightly holding from the other end is indicated as a torque value of “1 kgm”. When using 1kgm of torque force is enough to easily lift up a weight of 19.9kg by rod of 5cm length. And if the rod is 1cm of length, it can lift 99.9kg. That means if using diameter 2cm of shaft, it can lift up 99.9kg by the same force.
In other words, if a torque of “10 kgm” is applied to an outer circumference seamlessly with a radius of 35 cm (diameter of 70 cm) for 1 hour (3600 seconds), the accumulated amount of energy (consumption or total output) will be “36 kWh”. The rotation speed depends on the configuration of the gears and shafts relative to the generated torque load of power generating.
With using air compression device, it enables to increase power by many times and realize a lot of versatility.

This proves that by just adding simple process of water flow control, it enables to be converted and amplified to much far amount of “torque energy, i.e., a portion of rotational kinetic energy” than the normal consumption of potential energy like converting to the impact energy of water straight falling from above. This effect is easily verified by anyone, without any doubt. And there is no room for doubt that the exactly same amount of potential energy can be actually amplified and converted into tens or even hundreds of times more rotational energy due to simple timing control. The reason for the mysterious contradiction in the law of conservation of energy that has been believed like a religion until now is that lack of considering the mechanical correlation of gravitational properties on the time axis adequately.

When a helicopter is hovering, or “stationary” in the air, it has zero kinetic energy in physical kinetic energy calculations, or only the potential energy of the aircraft’s weight, but in order to maintain that state, it must consume lift energy equal to or greater than that potential energy every second to maintain the same position.
At first place, if the “law of conservation of energy” was absolutely correct, with only the energy of “thrust power” consumed by airplane’s engine, the airplane with its heavy weight of body never be able to fly up high into the the sky and keep gliding at fast speed while generating the enormous amount of “potential energy”. But airplane does fly as everybody knows. Because it obtains the energy from reaction of air pressure due to gravity.

Regardless of the amount of inflow water (input energy), the water accumulates to its limit in the multiple warped spaces within the distorted shaped turbine(flux capacitor turbine), and the weight of the accumulated water is converted into power of the torque (maximum moment of vector) 100%, generating a stable and extremely strong rotational energy(Output Energy) in the absolutely equaled weight balancing effect(the power of gravity). As the result, by making water circulation of relatively quite small and constant amount of water that overflows out from beyond the holding capacity of the slowly rotating turbine rotor, its turbine keeps rotating itself as amplifying torque from absorbing gravitational acceleration.
Furthermore, in case that this water circulation space is firmly closed, there is no energy demand(regenerating potential energy consumption) to pump up water due to siphon vacuum effect but just a quite small energy that moves water on horizontal to keep the water flux only. Therefore, by positioning this small force required to maintain water flux as input energy, it becomes the trigger for generating torque energy that is several tens of times greater, resulting it looks like occurring incredible energy amplification.
In reality, torque is grown up by simply changing the direction of the fluid flow according to the time axis(as time passes), control the falling speed of the water without adding any resistance, and it is just prolonging the “time” during which the water is affected by “gravity” (absorbing gravitational acceleration) in that simple and deep considered system structure how it works.


To begin with, the our original “Gravity Reactor” is not the first model of power generation system that utilizes infinite gravitational energy in cost free itself. The almost same logic of generating system has been existed for over 100 years ago under the name of “Hydroelectric power generation”.

Needless to say, the fundamental energy resource of driving force behind hydroelectric power generation is composed with gigantic global natural pumping system, store water as cloud high in the sky by wether changing. And that water falls to the ground as rain or snow in the great dynamic works with huge amount of water circulation on earth. And human make Dams to hold much of the water in high places. When they have demand electricity, fall the water, then increased water pressure turns turbines to generate electricity. In other words, the fundamental resources that power from hydroelectric power generation are all given at cost free like a gift from God. In this respect, it is almost the same as “Gravity Reactor“, and also it is no emission of heat or CO2 emissions, making it an ideal power generation system. However, there are a number of critical issues that have piled up, making it basically impossible to build more hydroelectric power plants in the future. These fatal challenges are;
Recently, there has been developed many of facilities called “gravity energy storage devices” that aim to supply stable energy on demand from unstable electricity generated by solar or wind power. The system lifts many of concrete blocks from using the unstable energy, store as potential energy and drop them slowly(absorbing gravitational acceleration) on loading the counter torque which rotates steadily shaft of generator to supply stable electricity on demand.

Gravity energy storage system seams that is trying to showing some meanings for the big investment for carbon-neutral electricity obtained from solar and wind power. While they are far cheaper than constructing large dams to generate hydroelectric power, the amount of electricity they can store and supply is far less, and the additional costs of building, operating, and maintaining the facilities are simply unacceptable to consumers. Therefore, it must be said that the possibility of widespread adoption of this system is extremely low, both physically and economically. At the first place, the manufacturing, installation, and maintenance costs of solar panels and windmills themselves are criticized as unprofitable, and such measures should be said that all simply eat up budgets earmarked for achieving a carbon-neutral society.
Nuclear energy is undoubtedly the strongest as artificial thermal power, and is the ultimate and final trump card in the current human civilization, which is dependent on thermal power. However, because of its intense thermal power, the costs of building the facilities and safety measures required to utilize it are extremely high much larger than hydraulic plant. Combined with global inflation, research and development costs, labor costs, and material costs are all rising, and electricity as the main stream supply prices are also soaring. Rising prices for major energy sources such as thermal power generation have further accelerated inflation, caused the value of currency to fall sharply, and physical resources to finance large-scale capital investment are to be running out.

The Construction Cost: ¥1- 2 trillion Yen
Depreciation term is about 50 years
Rating Output Power: 1,000,000 kWh
Utilization rate: less than 70%
Actual Output Power: under 700,000 kWh

The uranium fuel used in nuclear power generation requires a 3-5% content of a substance known as “uranium 235”, which is easily fissile. However, since the content of natural uranium is extremely low at 0.7%, the process of increasing this content is called “uranium enrichment.” In the process refining this enriched uranium requires a huge amount of electricity. When the cost of this electricity is taken into account, the fuel cost ratio of nuclear power generation becomes completely unprofitable.
Even more, currently the most concerned cost factor behind the rise in electricity costs is the increasing maintenance costs of the vast power transmission and distribution facilities. Most of the current facilities are aging and in need of reconstruction, and this cost alone could increase electricity bills several times over. The reality is that there is no room for building new power plants.
—– Above those are not criticism, it’s all objective fact —-
<< Objective Physical phenomenon >>

Global warming and boiling have long been thought to be caused by the greenhouse gas CO2, emitted during the combustion of materials. However, the current atmospheric CO2 concentration is 0.04%, and even if this concentration increased tenfold, there is no substantial physical evidence or logic that it would significantly change the Earth’s climate. Meanwhile, approximately 50% of the atmosphere is water vapor (humidity), the gas of elemental component is H2O. All thermal power generation, regardless of kind of fuel source (oil, nuclear, etc.), generates enormous amounts of water vapor. A simple calculation shows that approximately 10 liters of water are changed to steam gas for generating 1 kWh of electricity. Water expands in volume approximately 1,700 times when converted to steam. It has been clearly demonstrated that a 1°C rise in temperature increases the maximum amount of water vapor that air can hold (saturated vapor capacity) by approximately 7%. In considering all the amount of water vapor have been released for a long time from thermal power plants around the world, as a result of simple substantial physical phenomenon, it is safe to say that rising air pressure and rising temperatures go into a chain reaction, accelerates global warming and shifts to boiling. In that current situation, even if all thermal power plants were shut down at once, the temperature rise would continue unabated and not stop the chain reaction of temperature rise too unless water vapor was converted back into water without using thermal energy.

When a typical household air conditioner is running all day, it will produce about 10-20 liters of condensed water. It is self-evident that if this water is used to grow vegetables, fruits, and other plants, it will create a comfortable space for human society to escape the intense heat, while at the same time making it possible to very effectively absorb water vapor and CO2 from the atmosphere, which are considered to be the biggest causes of global warming. If this virtuous cycle model were to become widespread around the world, it would not only be possible to very efficiently suppress the main cause of the current boiling phenomenon of the earth, but it would also contribute quite effectively to resolving water shortages and food crises, improve the global environment, dramatically reduce the factors that lead to conflict, and build a new, peaceful, prosperous, and sustainable civilization.